October 2008

I love destroying buildings

http://weburbanist.com/2008/03/05/16-sweet-and-scary-building-demolitions-in-action/

 

Can building destructions be inspiring for building constructions? Just reverse it : it all unfolds beautifully doesn’t it? There is definitely something there…

Architecture
Blogging
DIY
Performance
Science
Space

Comments (0)

Permalink

All wikipedia geocoordinates on google earth !

http://www.webkuehn.de/hobbys/wikipedia/geokoordinaten/screenshots/Screenshot_Google_Earth_und_deWikipedia_Koordinaten_01.jpg

Stefan Kühn, a cartographer at the University Trier, Germany, has extracted all the geo coordinates embedded in articles on the WikiProject Geographical coordinates,  a Wikipedia project for ensuring standardized geocoding of locations in its articles.

Google Earth fans bent on instant gratification can simply download a KMZ file and start surfing. But more importantly, coders and infoviz geeks can get a comma-separated text file (CSV) with coordinates, titles and Wikipedia categories for all points. [Source : R-echos]

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything

download the video 74mb

Working from principles of differential geometry, physicist Garrett Lisi is developing a new unified theory that purports to explain all the elementary particles, and gravity, in one elegant model. His theory is based on a mathematical shape called E8. With 248 symmetries, E8 is large, complex and beautiful — and Lisi believes the relationships of its symmetries correspond to known particles and forces, including gravity.

His work, explained in his paper “An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything,” and in an ongoing discussion on FQXi, is still on science’s speculative fringe. But some physicists believe he could be pointing the way toward a truly unified theory.

“This is an ‘all or nothing’ kind of theory — meaning it’s going to end up agreeing with and predicting damn near everything, or it’s wrong. At this stage of development, it could go either way.”

Garrett Lisi on physicsforums.com

Code
Energy
Engineering
Object
Science
Sound
Space

Comments (0)

Permalink

plants’ energy storage system for solar technology

In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn’t shine. Daniel Nocera describes new process for storing solar energy:

See the video.

Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today’s announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.

Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun.

Daniel G. Nocera

“This is the nirvana of what we’ve been talking about for years,” said MIT’s Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. “Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon.”

oxygen gas bubbles in water

Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera’s lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun’s energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.

The key component in Nocera and Kanan’s new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity – whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source – runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.

Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.

The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it’s easy to set up, Nocera said. “That’s why I know this is going to work. It’s so easy to implement,” he said.

‘Giant leap’ for clean energy

Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world’s energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet’s energy needs for one year.

James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a “giant leap” toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.

“This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind,” said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. “The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem.”

‘Just the beginning’

Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.

More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.

“This is just the beginning,” said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-Director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. “The scientific community is really going to run with this.”

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/oxygen-graphic-1.jpg

Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.

The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today’s energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that “this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science.”

The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.

Original article by Anne Trafton, News Office July 31, 2008

Biology
DIY
Energy
Science
Survival
Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

design for 2012

Do you remember the big 2001 bug, everything was supposed to fail, the technological world should have collapsed… And you’re reading this blog.

Fear must have been the most powerful influence on politics, economy, family, personal emancipation since… forever. Some might say we are driven by our desires, I think we can attribute an equal responsability to fear, may it be of the father, the police, the state, satan, eternal damnation… So this is an opportunity for incredible power, for the ones that would propose a swindler type placebo solution… Do we want to be one of those, exploiting peoples fears? Or shall we bring -almost realistic- design proposal, like bunkers (aren’t they -fallout shelters- perfect objects of mind control?). And what if it really happens?

PU200611 Fig1.png

I don’t know if you heard about it, but the world -as we know it- is said to go through an extraordinary change pretty soon. They are supposingly many scientific correlationsand prophecies : The mayan calendarending, the real peak oil (graph above with different theories) or its aftermath, the end of Kyoto protocol, 7 billion humans on earth, eventually World Wide 3 (George Bush proposing World Wide 3 video), globalpandemic, the opening of freedom tower (ground zero), pole shift, (geomagnetic reversal), galactic alignment, we have our doomsday clock telling us how many minutes we are to “midnight“. 

Doomsday Clock graph

We have many ways to look at a plausible apocalypse (2012 doomsday video) more or less sound. So much mysteries, what do people expect from such an event? Freedom? Sudden death? A new Age? What can we sell them to celebrate (HAHAHAHAHAH!)? Make the end -new beginning- more comfortable? What is the relation of causality between our fear-desire (hypothesis of collective-conciousness) for the event and it’s actual happening? 

Today, what we call doomsday device is this :

Many hypothetical doomsday devices are based on the fact that salted hydrogen bombs can create large amounts of nuclear fallout.

Not very nice, it is called a planet killer  (could be an asteroid)… We might not die of it directly but of itsfallout, very gradually. Shouldn’t there be many different protective doomsday devices? Friendly ones! Shall we get out of this dominator culture?

It doesn’t matter if it is true or false, but anxiety is there… What to do of this anxiety? If we (humans) survive, shall we design longer term? Something completely out of cultural references, and according tocosmic patterns? Can we offer this “out of time” mind control - kingdom? How to embody such idea? Here is a nice forum of this crazyness. Enjoy life… NOW !

Architecture
Cesar Harada
Philosophy
Politics
Psychology
Royal College of Art
Science
Space

Comments (0)

Permalink

Mind control VS Free will

We were given today at the RCA a new brief “the blueprint of control, mind as material.

Maybe it is good to observe the forces involved. A priori it is quite simple, we generally apply mind control to the outside frustrating world, inside which we have difficulties applying our free will

But isn’t it our decision to mind control ourselves? Why such a bad judgement against mind control? 

Isn’t each of us free? Isn’t the world free? Some might say, we’re not, we can argue it is. Or it might be all about statistics or subconcious…

So where does this idea of mind control comes from?
Isn’t it : mind control ∈  free will? So why fearing it?

Or is the way free will proceeds is through mind control (taxonomy)?

I am lost…

Philosophy
Royal College of Art

Comments (0)

Permalink